[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Req: pitch-to-physical space mappings, refs
- To: Multiple recipients of list AUDITORY <AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Req: pitch-to-physical space mappings, refs
- From: David Chervenak <dcherven@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 1 Apr 1997 00:57:54 -0500
- In-reply-to: <199704010549.AAA19851@jupiter.cs.uml.edu> from "Sean Ferguson" at Apr 1, 97 00:40:18 am
- Reply-to: David Chervenak <dcherven@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: Research in auditory perception <AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>that the English horn is higher than the oboe on the same pitch then it
>is a result of the relative range of the instruments.
Chances are the listeners don't know/care the range of an oboe or
how to play one. My guess is that what they mean is that the horn has
more high frequency content / more higher harmonics than the oboe.