[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Why do you exist?
What is your purpose?
Does that purpose encompass all of acoustics & psychoacoustics?
And, hold truth about Nature's evolved mechanisms as prime goal?
Or, is the "form" in these communications of highest importance?
While content is ignored and UPPER-case deemed a "belligerent" act?
Surely expression of ideas - hard enough as that is - is permitted a range
to create a sense of, and enthusiasm for, the new - especially if, during
that process, the curtain lifts upon some new aspect of Nature.
We certainly would never have had Richard Feynman lectures.
Or, the tuned analogies of a Richard Dawkins.
I find it near comical that the Precedence Effect, demonstrated to be a
temporal (wave) "filter" in a very easily reproduced experiment, would
incite wasteful, tangential discussions of UPPER-case and comments
about length of text as if it were weighed-in as bologna (pun intended).
These kinds of comments are reminiscent of the banter between a
John Cleese and a Graham Chapman in an old MP episode.
Or, the original Macintosh commercial were a runner flashes through
a room of grey garbed listeners and throws a hammer at a room-sized
image of The Leader.
Thank you, Al Bregman for the comment ...
"Here's hoping that people will continue to participate fully and not have
to be inhibited by fear of criticism."
I am rarely inhibited. Certainly not by criticism since criticism is
But, I've still to read a critique of my "UNmixing Sources, i.e., The Cocktail
Party Effect" posting since criticism implies references to content !
McGill is running a new version of LISTSERV (1.8d on Windows NT).
Information is available on the WEB at http://www.mcgill.ca/cc/listserv