[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Audio Quality vs Expectation

Dear All,

Thank you very much for sending me all the references, both on the list and directly. I was asked to send them back to the list as some other people might be interested in this topic.

Slawek Zielinski

J. G. Beerends and F. E. de Caluwe, "The influence of video quality on perceived audio quality and vice versa", /J. Audio. //Eng.// Soc. / 47(5), 355-362, 1999.

M. Lavandier, S. Meunier, P. Herzog, "Perceptual and physical evaluation of differences among a large panel of loudspeakers" Forum Acusticum 2005

R. Bentler, D., Niebuhr, T. Johnson, and G. Flamme, "Impact of digital labeling on outcome measures," Ear and Hearing, vol. 24, pp. 215-224 (2003).

Toole, Floyd; Olive, Sean, "Hearing is Believing vs. Believing is Hearing: Blind vs. Sighted Listening Tests and Other Interesting Things", 97th Convention, Audio Eng. Soc., Preprint No. 3894 (1994 Nov.).

Woszczyk, Wieslaw; Bech, Søren; Hansen, Villy, "Interaction Between Audio-Visual Factors in a Home Theater System: Definition of Subjective Attributes", 99th Convention, Audio Eng. Soc., Preprint No. 4133 (1995 Sept.).

Bodden, Markus (1997). Instrumentation for sound quality evaluation.
Acustica/acta acustica, 83, 775 - 783.

Furmann, A., Hojan, E., Niewiarowicz, M. & Perz, P. (1990). On the correlation between the subjective evaluation of the sound and the objective evaluation of the acoustic parameters for a selected source. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, 38, 837-844.

Gabrielsson, A. & Sjögren, H. (1979). Perceived sound quality of sound-reproducing systems. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 65, 1010-1033.

Huss, C.J., Holt, G.J., Archibald, L. (1985). The highs and lows of double blind testing. Stereophile, 8, No. 5, 1-12.

Guastavino, C., & Katz, B. (2004). Perceptual evaluation of multi- dimensional spatial audio reproduction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116(2), 1105-1115.