[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to query
This is a not-uncommon issue - it does arise from time to time. Here is
my take on the "problem"
of negative values of d'.
First, we consider an identification task the same way as we would treat
a detection task. In
theory, detection was characterized as discriminating "Noise Alone" from
"Signal plus Noise,"
whereas identification involves two signals perturbed by noise. The
formal approach is the same.
As always, the ways numbers from data are treated depends on how they
are to be used. For
If these d' values are to be averaged with others, I would suggest
keeping the negative values;
If many observers gave reasonable data and one listener's data are
anomalous, I might try to find
a reason to discard the data;
If these represent overall data, you could check to see if they are
significantly different from zero.
This may not be easy; see Chapter 13 of Macmillan & Creelman, 2nd Ed.
If not significantly different from zero, I might report them as zero
If significant, I would look for a reason my experimental participant
labeled, for instance, a
/pa/ as a /ta/ reliably. A negative d' represents as successful
discrimination as a positive one. So,
if the observer simply used the wrong keys for responding I suppose
taking the absolute value
would not be out of the question.
This is only the beginning of what could be an extensive discussion. Is
your continuum really
unidimensional? Do listeners understand their task? Many questions.
At 01:22 PM 5/2/2006, silvadmr wrote:
>>I have some few small negative values of d' obtained from an
>>identification task in witch subjects label vowel sounds from a
>>continuum with tree phoneme labels. Generally, the graphs and tables
>>in the literature never show negative values of d' ( i think
>>it occurs here and there).
>>The interpretation of such values from an identification task of
>>that kind must not be the same as the interpretation of negative
>>values obtained in a yes-no experiment...cause in the case of
>>indentification we have "different sounds" rather then a "signal
>>stimulus" and a "signal plus noise stimulus".
>>What is the usually adopted procedure?
>>Should I take the absolute values (given the nature of the
>>identification task)?...should I convert them to 0? should I keep
C. Douglas Creelman 416-690-9407 (phone & fax)
9 Fernwood Park Ave. creelman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Toronto, ON Canada