[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Musical vs everyday listening
I think it -- 'aesthetic vs functional' listening was proposed much
earlier than than 1993.
There is the anecdotal (?) John Cage quote: "Music is all around us,
if we only had ears, we wouldn't need concert halls. "This was cited
by the narrator of the Everest LP of Variations IV from a 1965
recording in Los Angeles. Luc Ferrari in Presque Rien
http://emfinstitute.emf.org/exhibits/ferraririen.html is only one of
many 'soundscape' composers who propose to hear the universe in a
drop of sonic time. (There is also a 1971 (?) Broomhilda comic strip
with the single caption about 'music' appearing in the environment
... "It's always there, you just have to know how to coax it out.")
Composers and writers have spoken / written about this for a long
time, and my experience is that music from a radio can either be a
'musical' experience or an 'everyday' experience. Most of my early
life was lived with sound as an aesthetic experience, but there
again, I have also not seen a definition or description of 'musical'
proposed on this list.
Nobody 'na lissen, one crazy ol' birrd.
As I recall, in a more general sense, the idea of 'aesthetic
perception' as distinct and contrasted to 'functional' perception
occupies in about 35-40% of A la recherche du temps perdu by Marcel
Proust, which means about 400,000 + words, perhaps not a concise
formal proposition, but one well documented across the senses. A
Best wishes for the New Year
Brian Gygi wrote:
... this distinction between "musical" and "everyday" listening was
first formally proposed, as far as I know, by Bill Gaver in What Do
We Hear in the World (1993).