[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

forced-choice

To: AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: forced-choice
From: Christian Kaernbach <auditorymail@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 07:28:38 +0200
Delivery-date: Mon Aug 13 01:43:08 2007
List-archive: <http://lists.mcgill.ca/scripts/wa.exe?LIST=AUDITORY>
List-help: <http://lists.mcgill.ca/scripts/wa.exe?LIST=AUDITORY>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTS.MCGILL.CA?body=INFO AUDITORY>
List-owner: <mailto:AUDITORY-request@LISTS.MCGILL.CA>
List-subscribe: <mailto:AUDITORY-subscribe-request@LISTS.MCGILL.CA>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:AUDITORY-unsubscribe-request@LISTS.MCGILL.CA>
Reply-to: Christian Kaernbach <auditorymail@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: AUDITORY - Research in Auditory Perception <AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)

Dear List,

I am looking for references demonstrating that participants in a
forced-choice experiment, given the possibility to rate the confidence
of their forced choice, show better-than-random answers even at their
lowest confidence rating (which might be labeled "I guessed completely
because I did not know"). If I remember correctly this has been quite
enthusiastically studied in the 70ies, in terms of implicit and explicit
knowledge.

Thanks in advance,
Chris

--
Prof. Dr. Christian Kaernbach
Allgemeine Psychologie
Institut für Psychologie
Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel
Olshausenstr. 62
D-24098 Kiel
Germany
www.kaernbach.de

Prev by Date: Re: voice morphing
Next by Date: Re: voice morphing
Previous by thread: Re: voice morphing
Next by thread: PRATT by PAUL Boersma
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread