|
Dear Colleagues - On the continuing subject of ethics, I'm deeply touched
by Dr. Divenyi's concern, bearing in mind that he does not know me. I'm also
touched by his desire to introduce others to his unique interpretation of
modern professional salutations. Of course, I will accept his graceful
apology.
Now, can we all get back to the matter at hand? Regarding ethical
behavior, I have some published Letters to Editors. I thank Dr. Divenyi for
making me remember these letters. Please see the bibliography below. Most are
available free on the 'Net, should anyone be interested. - Lance Nizami
PhD
“Cheating the sciences”
University of “A new bristle in the toothbrush problem” APS Observer
22(2) p5 (2009) “Getting more bang for the buck” Forum, IEEE Spectrum
46(1) p10
(2009) “Physics: a calling or assembly line” Physics Today
61(11) p10-11 (2008) “What’s wrong with this profession?” Forum, IEEE Spectrum
45(5) p10 (2008) “Fining one’s place in physics” Physics Today 61(8) p8
(2008) “Is fraud really gone?” APS Observer 20(11) p5
(2007) “Roadblocks deter today’s Einsteins”, Physics Today
60(12) p12 (2007) “Scientists at the Gate”
“Publish−or−Perish Perspectives: Dividing Coauthors,
Valuing Referees, Taming Expectations” Physics Today 57(11) p11-12
(2004) “The paucity of grants among young scientists” Science
298 p2329 (2002) In a message dated 7/8/2009 12:19:21 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
pdivenyi@xxxxxxxxx writes:
On 7/7/09 7:39 PM, "Iftikhar Riaz (Lance) Nizami" <Nizamii2@xxxxxxx> wrote: |