Jont,
Its main contribution is that to our knowledge it seems to be the only
computational separation model that includes a precedence component.
-Pierre
On 9/2/14, 10:21 AM, "Jont Allen" <jontalle@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Pierre (or Dick),
>What is the main contribution of this MS? Can you say, in a few words?
>Jont
>
>On 09/01/2014 07:11 PM, Richard F. Lyon wrote:
>> Pierre, yes, I agree, that's a good one.
>> They had another the same year, which reached slightly different
>> conclusions about whether an interaural coherence measure is needed:
>> Hummersone, C., Brookes, T., and Mason, R. (2010). ³A comparison of
>> computational precedence models
>> for source separation in reverberant environments,² in Audio
>> Engineering Society Convention 128.
>>
>> I wonder why nobody applied these ideas in the subsequent challenges.
>>
>> Dick
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Pierre Divenyi <
>
>> > wrote:
>>
>> Dick,
>>
>> I found this article
>> Hummersone, C. (2010). ³Dynamic Precedence Effect Modeling for
>> Source Separation in Reverberant Environments ³, IEEE TRANSACTIONS
>> ON AUDIO, SPEECH, AND LANGUAGE PROCESSING, VOL. 18, NO. 7.
>> -Pierre
>>
>> From: "Richard F. Lyon" <dicklyon@xxxxxxx <mailto:dicklyon@xxxxxxx>>
>> Reply-To: "Richard F. Lyon" <dicklyon@xxxxxxx
>> <mailto:dicklyon@xxxxxxx>>
>> Date: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 at 1:47 PM
>> To: <AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
>> Subject: Precedence effect in real systems?
>>
>> I'm trying to find examples of where models of the precedent
>> effect have been applied to binaural or multi-microphone sound
>> separation or enhancements systems. Looking at recent REVERB and
>> CHiME challenges, I'm not finding much.
>>
>> Can anyone point me at successes or failures of precedence effect
>> models in systems that have actually been evaluated in some task
>> relative to other approaches?
>>
>> Dick
>>
>>
>
>