Re: unsolicited abstracts etc. ("charles s. watson" )

Subject: Re: unsolicited abstracts etc.
From:    "charles s. watson"  <watson(at)INDIANA.EDU>
Date:    Wed, 22 May 1996 16:21:12 -0500

I agree with you, Karen. People seem pretty up tight these days about being forced to use the delete command. My "save rate" from the auditory list is about 1:4, but the value of the occasional hits justify the ccost of the rejections.... Chuck Watson On Wed, 22 May 1996, Karen McComas wrote: > As long as folks continue to indicate the content of their messages in > their subject lines, I see no problem with the save > bandwidth, folks might want to consider including the url, instead of the > full text and an email address where one could write to get a copy via > email if ther eis no access to the web (however, they may generate more > mailings than the abstracts themselves...since many people use the reply > key for every response they generate to a mass mailing). > > > > :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: > > Karen L. McComas > Communication Disorders, Marshall University > Huntington, WV 25755-2634 > URL: > M**: Van*Faussien > More info? finger mccomas(at) >

This message came from the mail archive
maintained by:
DAn Ellis <>
Electrical Engineering Dept., Columbia University