Re: An effect I've been working on ("Gregory J. Sandell" )

Subject: Re: An effect I've been working on
From:    "Gregory J. Sandell"  <sandell(at)SPARKY.LS.LUC.EDU>
Date:    Tue, 18 Mar 1997 11:39:07 -0600

I'd like to ask Mr. Faria to clarify a few details of his interesting query. Regis Rossi A. Faria wrote [control character garbage edited out!]: > The wavelet approach has several advantages over normal Fourier filtering > since its filters have local support both in time and frequency, making it > easy to locate transients on some frequency bands. When you say "normal Fourier filtering" I assume you mean (1) a method such as the Phase Vocoder, where filters are typically allocated one-per-harmonic of an estimated fundamental, but not (2) a method such as McCauley&Quatieri where an arbitrary number of filters are allocated dynamically according to the signal. Is that true? Transients consist of non-harmonic information, and method (1) smears non-harmonic information over several bands. Then is what you are saying that wavelets more accurately assigns them to appropriate frequency bands? > Another advantage > of wavelet filtering is its property of separating bands with quality > factor (Q) constant over the frequency axis, in a way the basilar membrane > in > the inner ear also resolves frequency bands. This property makes wavelets > closer to ear's acoustic pre-processing, on stages before neural > processing. Is the nature of the advantage that (1) a person examining wavelet analysis output is observing "how the ear experiences the sound", or (2) the method is more economical by ignoring detail that goes beyond the resolving properties of the ear, or (3) both? > (1) the result of mixing the original tone with a reconstruction of the sound > from its wavelet coefficients (obtained in the forward transform) taking only > the coefficients in level n and "clamping" other coefficients (from all other > levels) to zero value (this is reconstructing only the level n and mixing it > to the original sound). Can you clarify what "in level n" means? Do you mean "only those coefficients whose value is n or greater? Thanks, Greg -- Gregory J. Sandell, Research Associate, sandell(at) Parmly Hearing Institute, Loyola University Chicago 6525 N. Sheridan Chicago IL 60626 USA voice:773-508-3976 FAX:773-508-2719 WWW:

This message came from the mail archive
maintained by:
DAn Ellis <>
Electrical Engineering Dept., Columbia University