Re: Discussion about "place pitch" concept (Martin Braun )


Subject: Re: Discussion about "place pitch" concept
From:    Martin Braun  <nombraun(at)TELIA.COM>
Date:    Thu, 18 Mar 2004 23:07:23 +0100

On Thursday, March 18, 2004 6:49 PM, Uwe Baumann wrote: > There have been discussions about the reasons of the poor contribution of > temporal information to pitch perception in electrical hearing. Poor neural > survival is one major argument. But even in case of a reduced number of > fibers, the rate code will be transmitted more accurately in electrical > hearing than by normal acoustical stimulation (Hartmann, 1984). Because this is an accuracy that is enforced rather "brutally". The price of the "brutality" is the low limit of neural phase coupling. More important than reduced numbers of afferent fibers in the cochlea probably is the absence of inner hair cells and their afferent synapses. Both are extremely sophisticated machines, which we only have started to explore. The secrets of HF period coding are hidden here. > The outlined observations are not able to counter the notion "There is no > physiology of place pitch", but they clearly indicate that there is a place > pitch in psychophysical electrical stimulation of the cochlea by means of > intracochlear electrode arrays. Thanks, Uwe. This is an important point. For peripheral encoding of period information the place of encoding is important, also in normal hearing. But this is not what theories of "place pitch" were dealing with. Rather, they suggested a coding of pitch by central cochleotopic patterns of harmonics, for which physiological evidence could never be found. By the way, there is a very recent and highly interesting paper which demonstrates the importance of peripheral encoding place: Oxenham et al. "Correct tonotopic representation is necessary for complex pitch perception", which appeared in Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, published online before print January 12, 2004 (10.1073/pnas.0306958101). This paper should be recommended to all who have to do with cochlear implants. It is also of importance for physiological concepts of pitch. For this reason I published a short comment on it: http://w1.570.telia.com/~u57011259/Oxenham.htm Martin -------------------------------- Martin Braun Neuroscience of Music S-671 95 Klässbol Sweden web site: http://w1.570.telia.com/~u57011259/index.htm


This message came from the mail archive
http://www.auditory.org/postings/2004/
maintained by:
DAn Ellis <dpwe@ee.columbia.edu>
Electrical Engineering Dept., Columbia University