Re: place pitch and temporal pitch (Martin Braun )


Subject: Re: place pitch and temporal pitch
From:    Martin Braun  <nombraun(at)TELIA.COM>
Date:    Thu, 25 Mar 2004 16:10:13 +0100

Dear Johan, and others, > Thank you for the interesting discussions on place pitch vs temporal > pitch. From a musicological point of view, I'm not convinced that the > terms "pitch height" vs "chroma" is so easy as it is usually described. I doubt that only the octave has the quality attached to "pitch height". There are numerous music styles where the quint (2:3) has that same quality and where the octave never occurs at all. Last year we had collective inquiries concerning historical evidence on the list of the Society of Music Theory (ca 1200 members) and concerning ethnological evidence on the list of the Society of Ethnomusicology (ca 500 members). There were many contributions on both lists. In the end it turned out that we had not one single case of a musical culture were the fifth has the role that the octave has in all large music cultures. http://listserv.indiana.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A1=ind0305c&L=sem-l&D=0&H=0&O=T&T=0 http://listserv.indiana.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A1=ind0305d&L=sem-l http://listserv.indiana.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A1=ind0305e&L=sem-l&D=0&H=0&O=T&T=0 http://listserv.indiana.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A1=ind0306a&L=sem-l Martin -------------------------------- Martin Braun Neuroscience of Music S-671 95 Klässbol Sweden web site: http://w1.570.telia.com/~u57011259/index.htm


This message came from the mail archive
http://www.auditory.org/postings/2004/
maintained by:
DAn Ellis <dpwe@ee.columbia.edu>
Electrical Engineering Dept., Columbia University