Re: Difference between cognition and perception? (Odd Torleiv Furnes )


Subject: Re: Difference between cognition and perception?
From:    Odd Torleiv Furnes  <o.t.furnes(at)HF.UIO.NO>
Date:    Sat, 17 Apr 2004 23:27:17 +0200

Dear Eliot >Odd Torleiv Furnes wrote: > >> >> Second, as the prime aspect of >>listening to music probably is that of pattern detection, memory - both of >>the recent unfolding events and of stored musical schemas - is active. > > >Despite the fact that you're reiterating a point I made in an earlier post, >I don't agree that "pattern detection" is "THE prime aspect of listening >to music." >THE prime aspect of listening to music is the fact that it has affective >significance. It's easy to say, "well we must extract such significance from >patterns," but we don't know that for a fact. I agree, for me the meaning of music is its affective value. Still, I believe that pattern detection (or lack thereof) precedes affection. There are a lot of things we don't know for a fact when it comes to music, but that pattern detection is prior to affection seems to me to be rather obvious. Torleiv


This message came from the mail archive
http://www.auditory.org/postings/2004/
maintained by:
DAn Ellis <dpwe@ee.columbia.edu>
Electrical Engineering Dept., Columbia University