Re: Traveling waves or resonance? (Eckard Blumschein )


Subject: Re: Traveling waves or resonance?
From:    Eckard Blumschein  <Eckard.Blumschein(at)E-Technik.Uni-Magdeburg.DE>
Date:    Mon, 18 Oct 2004 17:30:14 +0200

I apologize for incomplete links: For a comparison, look into pertaining figures at http://iesk.et.uni-magdeburg.de/~blumsche/M275.html http://iesk.et.uni-magdeburg.de/~blumsche/M277.html The real-valued ('natural') spectrogram does of course not yet consider the effect of cochlear amplifier on threshold. It merely ascribes what has perhaps wrongly been attributed to wave mechanics so far. According to findings of Geoffrey Manley who pointed to the fact that frequeny ratios are almost equal for very different animals, I tend to see critical bandwidth also controlled by a fully spread cochlear amplifier, maybe via the two spatial extensions of the standing traveling wave. The real-valued spectrogram may nonetheless support imagination. It illustrates how responses to rarefaction and condensation differ from each other. Eckard


This message came from the mail archive
http://www.auditory.org/postings/2004/
maintained by:
DAn Ellis <dpwe@ee.columbia.edu>
Electrical Engineering Dept., Columbia University