Re: Do phonemes = sounds? (Martin Braun )


Subject: Re: Do phonemes = sounds?
From:    Martin Braun  <nombraun(at)TELIA.COM>
Date:    Tue, 7 Jun 2005 16:14:21 +0200

On Tuesday, June 07, Branka ZEI wrote: "The present discussion shows that the most remarkable theoretical breakthroughs in linguistics and phonology ( I am referring to F. de Saussure's conceptualisation of language as well as the Prague School - and Trubetzkoy) have unfortunately fallen onto oblivion. They have not been proven wrong!" (.........) "Operating with phonemes involves abstraction and retension of only those features that are relevant for distinguishing meanings to the exclusion of many other that are present but not relevant in a given language. Like any cognitive construct it cannot be said to EXIST in measurable terms." Measuring what triggers a phoneme is called psychophysics. Measuring the representation of a phoneme is called neuroscience. There is nothing immaterial with a phoneme. The same can not be said about a structuralist concept, though ;-) Martin ---------------------------- Martin Braun Neuroscience of Music S-671 95 Klässbol Sweden web site: http://w1.570.telia.com/~u57011259/index.htm Similarly when you operate with a concept of "animal" it is irrelevant whether it has fur or feathers etc. Obviuously a phone to be recognised as a phoneme must present certain acoustic features that the listener will choose and recognise as part of the phonological system he is operating with. This is why speech synthesis can work. I agree with Laszlo Toth when he says: >The problem is that the word "recognition" inherently >contains a mapping of a data item to an abstract class. So it does not >deal with any of the sets but with the mapping between them. Best to all! Branka Zei Pollermann ________________________________________ Branka Zei Pollermann PhD Psychologue Psychiatrie de Liaison Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève 51 Bvd. De la Cluse, 1205 Genève tél. : 0041 22 382 48 81 Portable : 0041 79 203 92 17 ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. **********************************************************************


This message came from the mail archive
http://www.auditory.org/postings/2005/
maintained by:
DAn Ellis <dpwe@ee.columbia.edu>
Electrical Engineering Dept., Columbia University