Subject: Re: Critical bands v hearing loss From: "Richard H." <auditory(at)AUGMENTICS.COM> Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 10:13:07 +0100This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0064_01C5C415.39089BF0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In the radio world, using radio reflectors etc sized at 10% of the = wavelength is regarded as precise enough for accurate operation. I wonder if, in hearing aids, using more "bands" each set to say 10% or = so of the critical band width would ensure "precise" processing? ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Jan Schnupp=20 To: AUDITORY(at)LISTS.MCGILL.CA=20 Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 9:20 AM Subject: Re: Critical bands v hearing loss Jim is right to point out that things aren't as simple as that. You = could play a 100 Hz tone and a 110 Hz tone, but slightly offset their = interaural levels and their onsets, and they will be perceived as two = separate tones even though they fall into the same critical band. Or you = can play a 100Hz tone and a 300Hz tone simultaneously with the same = interaural level and you will perceive only one tone (albeit a = "complex", "harmonic" one) even though you now excite two well separated = critical bands. I wouldn't claim to be an expert, but the impression I = have is that, when it comes to auditory scene segmentation, critical = bands are not that critical. Or am I wrong there? Jan beaucham wrote: On Thu Sep 22 01:26:43 2005 Vinay S.N wrote: The human ear can only make sense of one signal per critical band. For example, if two sine tones of 100Hz and 110Hz are played, two distinct tones are not heard. This is because the critical bandwidth at 100Hz is about 80Hz, and the two tones would be within the same critical band; = one will only hear two distinct tones when the two excitations exist in separate critical bands. Hence there is no point in having controllable bands which are finer in resolution than a critical band. =20 I don't think this is true in general. If the tones are too close together (less than 20 Hz) beats will be heard. Between 20 and 40 Hz difference a roughness sensation is heard. Beyond that two tones can be heard. Also, if there are three tones, the relative phases can be aligned to imitate amplitude OR frequency modulation, and they sound entirely different. The question is how much detail can be heard within a critical band. The case I referred to in my previous note was the harmonic spectrum case, which I neglected to mention.) I'm sure this question has been explored, and I'd like to see some discussion on this topic by people in the psychoacoustic area. Jim =20 --=20 Dr Jan Schnupp University Laboratory of Physiology=20 Parks Road - Oxford OX1 3PT Tel +44-1865-272513 email: jan(at)physiol.ox.ac.uk http://www.physiol.ox.ac.uk/~jan/ ------=_NextPart_000_0064_01C5C415.39089BF0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD><TITLE></TITLE> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type = content=3Dtext/html;charset=3DISO-8859-1> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2722" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial>In the radio world, using radio reflectors etc = sized at=20 10% of the wavelength is regarded as precise enough for accurate=20 operation.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial>I wonder if, in hearing aids, using more "bands" = each set=20 to say 10% or so of the critical band width would ensure "precise"=20 processing?</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT> </DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20 style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; = BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV> <DIV=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: = black"><B>From:</B>=20 <A title=3Djan.schnupp(at)PHYSIOL.OX.AC.UK=20 href=3D"mailto:jan.schnupp(at)PHYSIOL.OX.AC.UK">Jan Schnupp</A> </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A = title=3DAUDITORY(at)LISTS.MCGILL.CA=20 href=3D"mailto:AUDITORY(at)LISTS.MCGILL.CA">AUDITORY(at)LISTS.MCGILL.CA</A> = </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, September 28, = 2005 9:20=20 AM</DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: Critical bands v = hearing=20 loss</DIV> <DIV><BR></DIV>Jim is right to point out that things aren't as simple = as that.=20 You could play a 100 Hz tone and a 110 Hz tone, but slightly offset = their=20 interaural levels and their onsets, and they will be perceived as two = separate=20 tones even though they fall into the same critical band. Or you can = play a=20 100Hz tone and a 300Hz tone simultaneously with the same interaural = level and=20 you will perceive only one tone (albeit a "complex", "harmonic" one) = even=20 though you now excite two well separated critical bands. I wouldn't = claim to=20 be an expert, but the impression I have is that, when it comes to = auditory=20 scene segmentation, critical bands are not that critical. Or am I = wrong=20 there?<BR><BR>Jan<BR><BR>beaucham wrote:<BR> <BLOCKQUOTE = cite=3Dmid200509271428.j8RESRKL017833(at)manfred.music.uiuc.edu=20 type=3D"cite"><PRE wrap=3D"">On Thu Sep 22 01:26:43 2005 Vinay S.N = wrote: </PRE> <BLOCKQUOTE type=3D"cite"><PRE wrap=3D"">The human ear can only make = sense of one signal per critical band. For example, if two sine tones of 100Hz and 110Hz are played, two distinct tones are not heard. This is because the critical bandwidth at 100Hz is about 80Hz, and the two tones would be within the same critical band; = one will only hear two distinct tones when the two excitations exist in separate critical bands. Hence there is no point in having controllable bands which are finer in resolution than a critical band. </PRE></BLOCKQUOTE><PRE wrap=3D""><!----> I don't think this is true in general. If the tones are too close together (less than 20 Hz) beats will be heard. Between 20 and 40 Hz difference a roughness sensation is heard. Beyond that two tones can be heard. Also, if there are three tones, the relative phases can be aligned to imitate amplitude OR frequency modulation, and they sound entirely different. The question is how much detail can be heard within a critical band. The case I referred to in my previous note was the harmonic spectrum case, which I neglected to mention.) I'm sure this question has been explored, and I'd like to see some discussion on this topic by people in the psychoacoustic area. Jim </PRE></BLOCKQUOTE><BR><PRE class=3Dmoz-signature cols=3D"72">--=20 Dr Jan Schnupp University Laboratory of Physiology=20 Parks Road - Oxford OX1 3PT Tel +44-1865-272513 email: <A class=3Dmoz-txt-link-abbreviated = href=3D"mailto:jan(at)physiol.ox.ac.uk">jan(at)physiol.ox.ac.uk</A> <A class=3Dmoz-txt-link-freetext = href=3D"http://www.physiol.ox.ac.uk/%7Ejan/">http://www.physiol.ox.ac.uk/= ~jan/</A></PRE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML> ------=_NextPart_000_0064_01C5C415.39089BF0--