Re: Reading versus books on tape (Toth Laszlo )


Subject: Re: Reading versus books on tape
From:    Toth Laszlo  <tothl@xxxxxxxx>
Date:    Thu, 6 Jul 2006 14:04:08 +0200

On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, tony stockman wrote: > anecdotally I believe for myself at any rate, as a blind person and > having used braille since primary school, braille reading is more > effective for learning than listening to tape. I think that quite many people (including me) performs a kind of visual learning. For example, I can recall even after years how a certain piece of information was positioned on the page of the book. Because of this, I can hardly imagine how I could learn anything by listening to a tape (I have never tried it, though). Sorry, this is only "anecdotal", but I hope somebody here can name some real study on this. Laszlo Toth Hungarian Academy of Sciences * Research Group on Artificial Intelligence * "Failure only begins e-mail: tothl@xxxxxxxx * when you stop trying" http://www.inf.u-szeged.hu/~tothl *


This message came from the mail archive
http://www.auditory.org/postings/2006/
maintained by:
DAn Ellis <dpwe@ee.columbia.edu>
Electrical Engineering Dept., Columbia University