Subject: Re: Experiments with large N From: Kelly Fitz <kelly_fitz@xxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2007 19:43:48 -0800 List-Archive:<http://lists.mcgill.ca/scripts/wa.exe?LIST=AUDITORY>Not only related! Just to clarify, I do not recall exactly when I pointed this out, but whenever I did, I was certainly referring to just this study. (There is, for example, a link to this work from my sound morphing web page http://www.cerlsoundgroup.org/Kelly/ soundmorphing.html) Kelly On Dec 1, 2007, at 5:43 PM, Matt Wright wrote: > Trevor Cox recently published the results of an online experiment > about listeners' ratings of sound files on a six-point scale ("not > horrible", "bad", "really bad", "awful", "really awful", and > "horrible"). To date he has 130,000 subjects (!) and about 1.5 > million data points: > > http://www.sea-acustica.es/WEB_ICA_07/fchrs/papers/ppa-09-003.pdf > > Here's the website for his experiment: http://www.sound101.org > > Clearly this is related to the "effect of visual stimuli on the > horribleness of awful sounds" that Kelly Fitz pointed out. > > -Matt > > > On Jun 29, 2007, at 12:32 AM, Massimo Grassi wrote: >> So far it looks that the experiment with the largest N (513!) is >> "The role of contrasting temporal amplitude patterns in the >> perception of speech" Healy and Warren JASA but I didn't check yet >> the methodology to see whether is a between or a within subject >> design. Kelly Fitz DSP Research Engineer, Starkey Hearing Research Center