Re: Theory of Timbre Perception (Chris Share )


Subject: Re: Theory of Timbre Perception
From:    Chris Share  <cshare01@xxxxxxxx>
Date:    Mon, 6 Aug 2007 18:24:31 +1000
List-Archive:<http://lists.mcgill.ca/scripts/wa.exe?LIST=AUDITORY>

> As the term psychoacoustics has evolved into perception and cognition, I > would place timbre on the 'cognition' side of this process, that is, it > doesn't exist except as interpreted by the brain. That's actually what I was interested in. For example, there are various theories of pitch perception (Place, Timing, Pattern). What I was asking is, are there any equivalent theories regarding timbre perception. When you say "the 'cognition' side of this process", where does this begin? Cheers, Chris


This message came from the mail archive
http://www.auditory.org/postings/2007/
maintained by:
DAn Ellis <dpwe@ee.columbia.edu>
Electrical Engineering Dept., Columbia University