Re: AUDITORY Digest - 18 Apr 2008 to 19 Apr 2008 (#2008-84) (Daniel Levitin )

Subject: Re: AUDITORY Digest - 18 Apr 2008 to 19 Apr 2008 (#2008-84)
From:    Daniel Levitin  <levitin@xxxxxxxx>
Date:    Sun, 20 Apr 2008 11:15:02 -0400

>I'm an example, acquiring AP when I was about 42. . .one >day listening to some music I became aware that >every time I heard a "b" I knew exactly what it was. It was not like >knowing a pitch by remembering the last time you heard it; I believe this is an example of what in the literature (going back to Bachem, 1954) is referred to as "quasi-Absolute Pitch," which is, by definition, when a person has "AP" for a single note or two. "True" AP possessors can label or produce any note. It's not clear from Eliot's description if the other notes he eventually acquired were identified with reference to this first note, in which case he has AP for a single note and used his excellent sense of RP (relative pitch) from there. If in fact Eliot acquired it, he would be the only case I know of an adult who did. > >Check They claim that many people have >acquired perfect pitch with their method and cite two studies in which it= >s >effectiveness has been confirmed: > >(1) Rush, M. A. An experimental investigation of the effectiveness of >training on absolute pitch in adult musicians, The Ohio State University. > >(2) Nering, Marguerite Elaine. A study to determine the effectiveness of >the David Lucas Burge technique for development of Perfect Pitch, The >University of Calgary. > I'm aware that David Burge and this method claim effectiveness in adults, and that they cite these two papers. But if you actually read those papers you'll see that the results were inconclusive. Dan Levitin

This message came from the mail archive
maintained by:
DAn Ellis <>
Electrical Engineering Dept., Columbia University