Objective intelligibility measurements (Kevin Austin )

Subject: Objective intelligibility measurements
From:    Kevin Austin  <kevin.austin@xxxxxxxx>
Date:    Wed, 17 Sep 2008 09:25:19 -0400

Hi I'm not sure that the word "objective" is being used correctly here. From my understanding perception (and perceptual evaluation) are anything but "objective"; I understand these methods to demonstrate statistical responses across the group tested, at the time of the testing. Unless this is about the intelligibility of the object being tested, in which case I think it would be "Object intelligibility measurements". Best wishes Kevin > ------------------------------ > > Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 12:26:18 +0200 > From: "Beerends, J.G. (John)" <john.beerends@xxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: 1. Objective intelligibility measurements (3) > > Dear All, > > We have been developing a "PESQ Intelligibility" and written a paper > for the J. of the Audio Engineering Society which is currently under > review. > > John Beerends > TNO ICT > Delft=20 > The Netherlands > -----Original Message----- > From: AUDITORY - Research in Auditory Perception > [mailto:AUDITORY@xxxxxxxx On Behalf Of Lorenzo Picinali > Sent: dinsdag 16 september 2008 12:00 > To: AUDITORY@xxxxxxxx > Subject: 1. Objective intelligibility measurements (3) > > Dear Matt, > I don't know if you have ever been using PESQ (Perceptual Evaluation > of > the Speech Quality, ITU Recommendation P.862)... > We started using it three years ago for the objective evaluation of > hearing aids audio quality, but at the end we concluded that for that > specific task, PESQ can generate problems ... >

This message came from the mail archive
maintained by:
DAn Ellis <dpwe@ee.columbia.edu>
Electrical Engineering Dept., Columbia University