Subject: Re: Request for comments of audio features for quality difference, thanks very much From: #ARIJIT BISWAS# <arijit17@xxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 23:19:22 +0800 List-Archive:<http://lists.mcgill.ca/scripts/wa.exe?LIST=AUDITORY>This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C93E90.F4535F3B Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-NAIMIME-Disclaimer: 1 X-NAIMIME-Modified: 1 Hi all! I'm interested in this topic as well, so anyone replying to Junyoung plea= se don't forget to add me on Cc ;-) Cheers, ~Arijit -----Original Message----- From: AUDITORY - Research in Auditory Perception on behalf of Junyong You Sent: Tue 11/4/2008 3:47 PM To: AUDITORY@xxxxxxxx Subject: Request for comments of audio features for quality difference, t= hanks very much =20 Dear all, Different audio contents may be given the different qualities, even at th= e same bitrate when coded. I am looking for the audio features which can = be used to express the difference between the different contents. For exa= mple, in subjective video quality assessment, the spatial complex and the= temporal motion activity can be used in selecting the video samples. So,= are there the similar and comparatively simple audio features? Your comments will be highly appreciated, thank you very much. Best Regards, Junyong **Disclaimer**=0AThe sender of this email is NOT authorized to represent = or act on behalf of Nanyang Technological=0AUniversity in any matter or t= ransaction by means of using this email account.=0A=0ANanyang Technologic= al University will not be responsible for any content or views expressed = in this =0Aemail and this email does not express the views or opinions of= the Nanyang Technological University.=0A ------_=_NextPart_001_01C93E90.F4535F3B Content-Type: text/HTML; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-NAIMIME-Disclaimer: 1 X-NAIMIME-Modified: 1 <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> <HTML> <HEAD> <META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-885= 9-1"> <META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7653.3= 8"> <TITLE>RE: Request for comments of audio features for quality difference,= thanks very much</TITLE> </HEAD> <BODY> <!-- Converted from text/plain format --> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Hi all!<BR> <BR> I'm interested in this topic as well, so anyone replying to Junyoung plea= se don't forget to add me on Cc ;-)<BR> <BR> Cheers,<BR> ~Arijit<BR> <BR> <BR> -----Original Message-----<BR> From: AUDITORY - Research in Auditory Perception on behalf of Junyong You= <BR> Sent: Tue 11/4/2008 3:47 PM<BR> To: AUDITORY@xxxxxxxx<BR> Subject: Request for comments of audio features for quality difference, t= hanks very much<BR> <BR> Dear all,<BR> <BR> Different audio contents may be given the different qualities, even at th= e same bitrate when coded. I am looking for the audio features which can = be used to express the difference between the different contents. For exa= mple, in subjective video quality assessment, the spatial complex and the= temporal motion activity can be used in selecting the video samples. So,= are there the similar and comparatively simple audio features?<BR> <BR> Your comments will be highly appreciated, thank you very much.<BR> <BR> Best Regards,<BR> <BR> Junyong<BR> <BR> </FONT> </P> <DIV><P><HR> **Disclaimer**<BR>=0AThe sender of this email is NOT authorized to repres= ent or act on behalf of Nanyang Technological<BR>=0AUniversity in any mat= ter or transaction by means of using this email account.<BR>=0A<BR>=0ANan= yang Technological University will not be responsible for any content or = views expressed in this <BR>=0Aemail and this email does not express the = views or opinions of the Nanyang Technological University.<BR>=0A </P></DIV> </BODY> </HTML> ------_=_NextPart_001_01C93E90.F4535F3B--