Re: (off-topic) self-plagiarism (Pierre Divenyi )


Subject: Re: (off-topic) self-plagiarism
From:    Pierre Divenyi  <pdivenyi@xxxxxxxx>
Date:    Tue, 7 Jul 2009 17:00:23 +0200
List-Archive:<http://lists.mcgill.ca/scripts/wa.exe?LIST=AUDITORY>

I respectfully disagree with Peter. When a journal sends a paper for review, it is often explicitly but always implicitly implied that the paper and its content are confidential. -Pierre On 7/7/09 4:28 PM, "Peter Lennox" <P.Lennox@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > You could post the paper (or indeed, the previous ones) to the Turnitin > website if you have an account, - this will document areas of coincidence and, > even if the paper is then taken down, future versions will be checked against > it and receive a correspondingly high coincidence score > Regards > ppl > > Dr Peter Lennox > > Director of Signal Processing and Applications Research Group (SPARG) > School of Technology, > Faculty of Arts, design and Technology University of Derby, UK > > p.lennox@xxxxxxxx > (01332) 593155 > http://sparg.derby.ac.uk/SPARG/Staff_PLX.asp


This message came from the mail archive
http://www.auditory.org/postings/2009/
maintained by:
DAn Ellis <dpwe@ee.columbia.edu>
Electrical Engineering Dept., Columbia University