Re: (off-topic) self-plagiarism ("Iftikhar Riaz (Lance) Nizami" )


Subject: Re: (off-topic) self-plagiarism
From:    "Iftikhar Riaz (Lance) Nizami"  <Nizamii2@xxxxxxxx>
Date:    Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:35:27 EDT
List-Archive:<http://lists.mcgill.ca/scripts/wa.exe?LIST=AUDITORY>

-------------------------------1247074527 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In an earlier posting in this particular series, I noted that: "The rules that journals apply to submissions, which we are all aware of, are based on a condition which all journals wisely state in their submission policy, that is, that the material has not been submitted for publication in any other peer-review journal, past or present. Sending plagiarized material to a peer-review journal clearly violates that trust and automatically voids any considerations of confidentiality." To me, this sounds like the same thing that Dr. Pastore is saying - that is, that any privilege or innocence on the plagiarist's part is lost when they misrepresent the originality of the work. - Lance Nizami PhD In a message dated 7/8/2009 12:59:32 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, pastore@xxxxxxxx writes: Dear All: One point apparently missed in the exchange to this point is that many societies require that the submission cover letter include a statement that the material in the submission has not been published elsewhere. If such a statement is required, but was missing in the cover letter, the journal editor should have requested the statement before sending the manuscript to reviewers. If the author made the statement, then not only is there is the added ethical violation of having submitted the manuscript under false pretenses, opening up a range of possible further actions. Dick Pastore Richard Pastore Distinguished Service Professor Department of Psychology Binghamton University Binghamton, NY 13902-6000 > **************Popular laptop deals plus free shipping! (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1221917659x1201411421/aol?redir=http:%2F%2Faltfarm.media plex.com%2Fad%2Fck%2F12309%2D81939%2D1629%2D2) -------------------------------1247074527 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; charset=3DUS-ASCII"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.6000.16850" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD> <BODY id=3Drole_body style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #000000; FONT-FAMILY= : Arial" bottomMargin=3D7 leftMargin=3D7 topMargin=3D7 rightMargin=3D7><FONT id=3Dr= ole_document face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size=3D2> <DIV>In an earlier posting in this particular series, I noted that:</DIV> <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV> <DIV>"The rules that journals apply to submissions, which we are all aware= of, are based on a condition which all journals&nbsp;wisely state in their submission policy, that is, that the material has not been submitted for= publication in any other peer-review journal, <EM>past or present</EM>. Se= nding plagiarized material to a peer-review journal clearly violates that trust= and automatically voids any considerations of confidentiality."</DIV> <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV> <DIV>To me, this sounds like the same thing that Dr. Pastore is saying -= that is, that any privilege or innocence on the plagiarist's part is lost when= they misrepresent the originality of the work. - Lance Nizami PhD</DIV> <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV> <DIV> <DIV>In a message dated 7/8/2009 12:59:32 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, pastore@xxxxxxxx writes:</DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid"= ><FONT style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=3DArial color=3D#000000 siz= e=3D2>Dear All:<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp; One point apparently missed in the exchange to this= point is that many <BR>societies require that the submission cover letter incl= ude a statement that <BR>the material in the submission has not been published= elsewhere.&nbsp; If such a <BR>statement is required, but was missing in= the cover letter, the journal <BR>editor should have requested the statement= before sending the manuscript to <BR>reviewers.&nbsp; If the author made= the statement, then not only is there is the <BR>added ethical violation of= having submitted the manuscript under false <BR>pretenses, opening up a range= of possible further actions.<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp; Dick Pastore<BR><BR>Richard Pastore<BR>Distinguished Service Professor<BR>Department of Psychology<BR>Binghamton University<BR>Binghamton, NY 13902-6000<BR>&gt;= <BR></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></FONT><DIV CLASS=3D"aol_ad_footer" ID=3D"= b3bcd3a45a161078c7ae47928e08eb79"><br/><font style=3D"color:black;font:nor= mal 10pt arial,san-serif;"> <hr style=3D"margin-top:10px"/><A HREF=3Dhttp:= //pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1221917659x1201411421/aol?redir=3Dhttp:= %2F%2Faltfarm.mediaplex.com%2Fad%2Fck%2F12309%2D81939%2D1629%2D2>Popular= laptop deals plus free shipping!</A></font></DIV></BODY></HTML> -------------------------------1247074527--


This message came from the mail archive
http://www.auditory.org/postings/2009/
maintained by:
DAn Ellis <dpwe@ee.columbia.edu>
Electrical Engineering Dept., Columbia University