Re: f0 frequency difference limen ("Alain de Cheveigne'" )


Subject: Re: f0 frequency difference limen
From:    "Alain de Cheveigne'"  <Alain.de.Cheveigne@xxxxxxxx>
Date:    Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:29:12 +0000
List-Archive:<http://lists.mcgill.ca/scripts/wa.exe?LIST=AUDITORY>

According to [Henning, G. B. and Grosberg, S. L. (1968). "Effect of harmonic components on frequency discrimination." J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 44: 1386-1389.], for fundamental frequencies below 2 kHz, discrimination is better for complex than pure tones (above 2 kHz it is the same). According to the theory of [Goldstein, J. L. (1973). "An optimum processor theory for the central formation of the pitch of complex tones." J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 54: 1496-1516.], F0 discrimination of a complex is at least as good as that of each of its components. Both suggest that complex tone limens should be at least as small as pure tone limens if not better. The classic source for those is [Moore, B. C. J. (1973). "Frequency difference limens for short-duration tones." J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 54: 610-619.]. If I remember correctly, pure tone FDLs are as low as 0.2% at 2kHz. For a more recent study see [Gockel, H., Moore, B. C. J., Carlyon, R. P. and Plack, C. J. (2007). "Effect of duration on the frequency discrimination of individual partials in a complex tone and on the discrimination of fundamental frequency." J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121: 373-382.]. They report thresholds as low as 0.2% for partials, 0.1% for the complex. Alain >Dear members of the list, > >Is there a consensus on the size of the frequency difference limen >for the f0 of complex tones such as those >produced by musical instruments - i.e. containing both resolved and >unresolved harmonics. References to papers >describing the precise nature of the tests used would also be helpful. > >Many thanks > >Andrew Milne > >------------------------------------------------- >Visit Pipex Business: The homepage for UK Small Businesses > >Go to http://www.pipex.co.uk/business-services


This message came from the mail archive
http://www.auditory.org/postings/2009/
maintained by:
DAn Ellis <dpwe@ee.columbia.edu>
Electrical Engineering Dept., Columbia University