Re: AUDITORY Digest - 5 Oct 2009 to 6 Oct 2009 (#2009-229) ("Watson, Charles S." )


Subject: Re: AUDITORY Digest - 5 Oct 2009 to 6 Oct 2009 (#2009-229)
From:    "Watson, Charles S."  <watson@xxxxxxxx>
Date:    Wed, 7 Oct 2009 22:43:02 -0400
List-Archive:<http://lists.mcgill.ca/scripts/wa.exe?LIST=AUDITORY>

Dear LIST, Over the past 25 years or so we have been refining a battery of tests of auditory acuity for tones, tonal patterns, and speech, called the Test of Basic Auditory Capabilities (TBAC) Most recently we used that eight-subtest battery, plus eleven other auditory tests, in a study of individual differences in auditory abilities among 340 young adult listeners with normal audiograms (Kidd et al., JASA, 2007). After quite a few requests for this battery we have put together a computer-controlled version, the TBAC-4, which has recorded instructions, etc., requires a little over one hour, and yields pretty reliable measures (thresholds, percentile rankings, and an estimate of "auditory G"...your auditory IQ). It is described in some detail, and there is a downloadable manual for its use, at http://www.comdistec.com/new/TBAC.html . Yes, there is a charge for it, but it is pretty cheap as such things go. I won't tell you how much, as that would be way too crass for the LIST. Best to all, Chuck Watson Indiana University and CDT, Inc. ************************************************************


This message came from the mail archive
http://www.auditory.org/postings/2009/
maintained by:
DAn Ellis <dpwe@ee.columbia.edu>
Electrical Engineering Dept., Columbia University