Re: Evaluating quality of compression scheme? (Robert Turetsky )


Subject: Re: Evaluating quality of compression scheme?
From:    Robert Turetsky  <rjt72@xxxxxxxx>
Date:    Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:40:34 -0500
List-Archive:<http://lists.mcgill.ca/scripts/wa.exe?LIST=AUDITORY>

Hi all, Thank you for your kind and pertinent suggestions, I've definitely got some thinking to do as to the best way to proceed. I'll keep you posted for sure! Thanks, Rob ------- Robert Turetsky rob@xxxxxxxx Bionet Group @xxxxxxxx Columbia University http://bionet.ee.columbia.edu -----Original Message----- From: AUDITORY - Research in Auditory Perception [mailto:AUDITORY@xxxxxxxx On Behalf Of Robert Turetsky Sent: Monday, November 16, 2009 3:33 PM To: AUDITORY@xxxxxxxx Subject: Evaluating quality of compression scheme? Hi all, I'm a long time reader, first time poster. We are developing a somewhat auditory-system based compression scheme for speech and audio and, in addition to listening to the decompressed audio (naturally), we would like to computationally evaluate the faithfulness of the compressed version to the original. Aside from SNR, are there any standard/community accepted ways of evaluating audio that has undergone lossy compression? Thanks in advance, Rob


This message came from the mail archive
/home/empire6/dpwe/public_html/postings/2009/
maintained by:
DAn Ellis <dpwe@ee.columbia.edu>
Electrical Engineering Dept., Columbia University