Subject: Re: Rationale for Critical Bands From: Daniel Shub <Daniel.Shub@xxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 11:58:36 +0100 List-Archive:<http://lists.mcgill.ca/scripts/wa.exe?LIST=AUDITORY>Oxenham and colleagues have published a number of studies about critical bands/auditory filters. For a comparison between "physiology" and psychophysics see: Christopher A. Shera, John J. Guinan, Jr., and Andrew J. Oxenham, Revised estimates of human cochlear tuning from otoacoustic and behavioral measurements PNAS 2002 99 (5) 3318-3323; published ahead of print February 26, 2002, doi:10.1073/pnas.032675099) For an investigation of level dependence see: Level dependence of auditory filters in nonsimultaneous masking as a function of frequency Andrew J. Oxenham and Andrea M. Simonson, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119, 444 (2006), DOI:10.1121/1.2141359 For issues regarding the phase response see: Towards a measure of auditory-filter phase response Andrew J. Oxenham and Torsten Dau, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110, 3169 (2001), DOI:10.1121/1.1414706 And Estimates of auditory filter phase response at and below characteristic frequency (L) Andrew J. Oxenham and Stephan D. Ewert, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117, 1713 (2005), DOI:10.1121/1.1863012 ---------- Daniel E. Shub, Ph.D. National Biomedical Research Unit in Hearing School of Psychology, Room C56 Nottingham University, University Park Nottingham NG7 2RD This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system: you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.