history of hearing science reference (Valeriy Shafiro )


Subject: history of hearing science reference
From:    Valeriy Shafiro  <firosha@xxxxxxxx>
Date:    Tue, 30 Aug 2016 17:39:40 -0500
List-Archive:<http://lists.mcgill.ca/scripts/wa.exe?LIST=AUDITORY>

--001a114e60e007f83e053b51a818 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Dear list members, I am looking for suggestions for your favorite book, article or chapter that provides a comprehensive treatment of the history of hearing science that I could use in a graduate level course. Most hearing science textbooks that I have seen go straight to the description of acoustic and perceptual phenomena and underlying physiology with an occasional historical anecdote. I have seen some interesting and useful history overviews in works introducing new paradigms and theoretical perspectives such as John Neuhoff's Ecological Psychoacoustics or Arlinger's et al. The emergence of cognitive hearing science. However, beyond that I have not seen much on the history of hearing science that would introduce major developments, questions, ideas. Maybe this is because hearing science is still young and is not a tightly defined discipline with its history scattered across other fields, but I am curious if something has already been written. cheers, Valeriy --001a114e60e007f83e053b51a818 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div><div>Dear list members,<br><br></div>I am lookin= g for suggestions for your favorite book, article or chapter that provides = a comprehensive treatment of the history of hearing science that I could us= e in a graduate level course.=C2=A0 Most hearing science textbooks that I h= ave seen go straight to the description of acoustic and perceptual phenomen= a and underlying physiology with an occasional historical anecdote.=C2=A0 I= have seen some interesting and useful history overviews in works introduci= ng new paradigms and theoretical perspectives such as John Neuhoff&#39;s Ec= ological Psychoacoustics or Arlinger&#39;s et al. The emergence of cognitiv= e hearing science.=C2=A0 However, beyond that I have not seen much on the h= istory of hearing science that would introduce major developments, question= s, ideas. Maybe this is because hearing science is still young and is not a= tightly defined discipline with its history scattered across other fields,= but I am curious if something has already been written.<br><br></div><div>= cheers,<br></div><div><br></div><br></div>Valeriy<br></div> --001a114e60e007f83e053b51a818--


This message came from the mail archive
/var/www/html/postings/2016/
maintained by:
DAn Ellis <dpwe@ee.columbia.edu>
Electrical Engineering Dept., Columbia University