[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

*To*: AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx*Subject*: Re: equal loudness calculation*From*: Julian Rohrhuber <rohrhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>*Date*: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 12:18:54 +0200*Delivery-date*: Mon Apr 18 06:23:51 2005*In-reply-to*: <001d01c543f2$07902140$33212a9e@Neutrino>*References*: <f06200720be8189f1a41f@[134.100.43.234]> <001d01c543f2$07902140$33212a9e@Neutrino>*Reply-to*: Julian Rohrhuber <rohrhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>*Sender*: AUDITORY Research in Auditory Perception <AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

This is the analitic equation for A-Weighting.

http://www.beis.de/Elektronik/AudioMeasure/WeightingFilters.html#A-Weighting

thank you, this is quite exactly what I was looking for.

Just, pass it to Z domain and use "a" and "b" coef. in a IIR filter.

in this case, I don't want to filter a sound, but simply scale its amplitude. Or is there a way to make the formula itself efficient by implementing it as a filter?

Very efficient !

JJ

----- Original Message ----- From: "Julian Rohrhuber" <rohrhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 4:25 PM Subject: [AUDITORY] equal loudness calculation

I'm looking for a computationally efficient way to do a frequency dependent amplitude compensation. The emphasis is much less accuracy (especially not for different loudness levels) but more a reasonable approximation - maybe a polynomial.

Any hints?

--

.

--

.

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: equal loudness calculation***From:*Jose-Javier Lopez

**References**:**equal loudness calculation***From:*Julian Rohrhuber

**Re: equal loudness calculation***From:*Jose-Javier Lopez

- Prev by Date:
**Summary of normal hearing** - Next by Date:
**Re: equal loudness calculation** - Previous by thread:
**Re: equal loudness calculation** - Next by thread:
**Re: equal loudness calculation** - Index(es):