[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: HC selectivity ... was Re: Physiological models of cochlea activity - alternatives to the travelling wave
At 12:55 PM +1000 9/28/07, Matt Flax wrote:
I do not think that HC frequency selectivity has anything to do with the
frequency selectivity of the Cochlea amplifier - over the range of
I agree with Matt. To the extent that you want to consider the
response of hair cells to be frequency selective, that selectivity
should probably be explained primarily by the hydrodynamic system
that they are a part of; it is easy to model all kinds of tuning
curves without any highly tuned mechanisms.
> The "gold rush" of recent decades for mathematically formulated models of
mammalian cochlear function can perhaps best be compared with the gold rush
of the alchemists in the Middle Ages.
Martin, how can one make, test, or communicate theories about a
complicated system without models? Or is "mathematically formulated"
meant to limit your complaint to a particular class of cochlear
models? If so, can you explain more clearly what class that is, or
what the alternative formulation is?
Do you really not believe in the travelling wave?