[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Cochlea Amplifier models : a new list

To: AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Cochlea Amplifier models : a new list
From: "Richard F. Lyon" <DickLyon@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 14:48:27 -0700
Comments: To: reinifrosch@bluewin.ch
Delivery-date: Thu Oct 18 22:52:23 2007
In-reply-to: <17516305.535491192737354024.JavaMail.webmail@ps8zhh.bluewin.ch>
List-archive: <http://lists.mcgill.ca/scripts/wa.exe?LIST=AUDITORY>
List-help: <http://lists.mcgill.ca/scripts/wa.exe?LIST=AUDITORY>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTS.MCGILL.CA?body=INFO AUDITORY>
List-owner: <mailto:AUDITORY-request@LISTS.MCGILL.CA>
List-subscribe: <mailto:AUDITORY-subscribe-request@LISTS.MCGILL.CA>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:AUDITORY-unsubscribe-request@LISTS.MCGILL.CA>
References: <17516305.535491192737354024.JavaMail.webmail@ps8zhh.bluewin.ch>
Reply-to: "Richard F. Lyon" <DickLyon@xxxxxxx>
Sender: AUDITORY - Research in Auditory Perception <AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Matt says you are pointing out two distinct peaks. So I repeat my question from before: does the data support only that interpretation? Or can the two (active and passive) peaks be just as well interpreted as two ends of a level-dependent continuum, reflecting a degree of active involvement?

Active traveling-wave models as I know them show a continuous behavior between low-level active and high-level passive, with degree of activity also influenced by efferent control and local adaptation state. Do you believe the data support that notion? Or contradict it? Or neutral?

Dick

References:
- Re: Cochlea Amplifier models : a new list
  - From: reinifrosch@xxxxxxxxxx

Prev by Date: Re: Cochlea Amplifier models : a new list
Next by Date: OT: email format
Previous by thread: Re: Cochlea Amplifier models : a new list
Next by thread: Re: Cochlea Amplifier models : a new list
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread