[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Reference to Fant's definition of the Mel scale

To: AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Reference to Fant's definition of the Mel scale
From: Steve Beet <steve.beet@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 20:59:59 -0000
Approved-by: steve.beet@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon Mar 7 16:14:06 2011
List-archive: <http://lists.mcgill.ca/scripts/wa.exe?LIST=AUDITORY>
List-help: <http://lists.mcgill.ca/scripts/wa.exe?LIST=AUDITORY>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTS.MCGILL.CA?body=INFO AUDITORY>
List-owner: <mailto:AUDITORY-request@LISTS.MCGILL.CA>
List-subscribe: <mailto:AUDITORY-subscribe-request@LISTS.MCGILL.CA>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:AUDITORY-unsubscribe-request@LISTS.MCGILL.CA>
References: <20101007213645.637317165@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20101008094422.E19A78110@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20101008130215.358FE5685@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20101008133504.CC22085FA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20101008160029.91F48AD35@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Steve Beet <steve.beet@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: AUDITORY - Research in Auditory Perception <AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: ActnAgV/ddi4OgEyQMSwOEet5GNuSgAGkXDQHXtfziA=

Hi Dick,

I haven't got a copy of the paper you asked about, but in Fant's 1970
"Acoustic Theory of Speech Production" he refers to a 1940 paper by Stevens
and Volkman (Amer. J. Psychology, 53, pp. 329-353). Maybe that would be an
alternative? But I don't have that one either I'm afraid!

Steve Beet

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Reference to Fant's definition of the Mel scale
  - From: Fred Herzfeld

Prev by Date: Re: frequency to mel formula
Next by Date: Re: Reference to Fant's definition of the Mel scale
Previous by thread: Re: frequency to mel formula
Next by thread: Re: Reference to Fant's definition of the Mel scale
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread