[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Al Bregmen wrote:
>This issue also comes up in talking about timbre. The waveform
>by an instrument has no timbre (if one reserves the word "timbre" for
>describing experience) but can be described by a number of physical
>variables. I think of timbre as a dimension of the experience of
>(SOUND2) that results from the physical "sound" (SOUND1). It would be
>helpful if we had a different word for SOUND1 and SOUND2, but we don't.
>we did, the old philosophical question, "Does a tree falling in the
>make a sound if there is no one to hear it?", would never have been
>thought to be a puzzle.
Forgive me if I'm oversimplifing the problem, but I resort to the
SOUND1 = acoustic wave
SOUND2 = sound
Thus, using these definitions, a tree falling in the woods produces an
acoustic wave and also creates a sound if there is someone present to
McGill is running a new version of LISTSERV (1.8c on Windows NT).
Information is available on the WEB at http://www.mcgill.ca/cc/listserv