Would it be better to use a model that included a definition of perception or cognition as part of its raison d'etre? Ecological perception for instance? My (somewhat naive) understanding of the Gibsonian model might consider perception as an order above the enivironment and the organism. If so, then could/would cognition might be considered internal to the organism. I'm still trying to get down my own understanding of the Gibson stuff actually. r Christian Kaernbach wrote:
Oh, let's make it a pun and turn this sentence to:
My opinion is that information processing models
are not very useful concepts
in the study of perception and cognition.
;-)