[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: reference needed (ASR)
I can't think of a reason that the answer would be different for ASR.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Toth Laszlo" <tothl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 7:50 AM
Subject: Re: reference needed (ASR)
> On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Christine Rankovic wrote:
> > support this statement with data from poorly conducted speech
> > tests like, for example, those conducted with an inadequate number of
> > items, or when mean scores comprise scores of too few listeners.
> Sorry if I was misleading, but the question was about automatic
> (machine) speech recognition. That's why I tried to warn you that it was
> I asked the question here because I know that some great ASR people are
> lurking here. I apologize to all those others who are interested only in
> human speech perception.
> Laszlo Toth
> Hungarian Academy of Sciences *
> Research Group on Artificial Intelligence * "Failure only begins
> e-mail: tothl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx * when you stop trying"
> http://www.inf.u-szeged.hu/~tothl *