We have been getting some nice results from the Edirol FireWire AudioCapture FA-101 external soundcard.
>From: Douglas Eck <eckdoug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Reply-To: Douglas Eck <eckdoug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: AUDITORY Digest - 3 May 2005 to 4 May 2005 (#2005-87)
>Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 05:42:37 -0400
>MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2)
>Received: from torrent.cc.mcgill.ca ([18.104.22.168]) by mc4-f28.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Thu, 5 May 2005 04:01:24 -0700
>Received: from mailscan3.cc.mcgill.ca (mailscan3.CC.McGill.CA [22.214.171.124])by torrent.cc.mcgill.ca (8.12.11/8.12.3) with ESMTP id j45AwDmx026580;Thu, 5 May 2005 06:58:35 -0400
>Received: from lists.mcgill.ca (lists.McGill.CA [126.96.36.199])by mailscan3.cc.mcgill.ca (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j45AuVZF029115;Thu, 5 May 2005 06:57:02 -0400 (EDT)
>Received: from lists (lists.McGill.CA) by lists.mcgill.ca (LSMTP for Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id <0.0004047A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 5 May 2005 6:56:30 -0400
>Received: from LISTS.MCGILL.CA by LISTS.MCGILL.CA (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8d) with spool id 7083341 for AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Thu, 5 May 2005 06:56:09 -0400
>Received: from torrent.cc.mcgill.ca by lists.mcgill.ca (LSMTP for Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id <0.00040427@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 5 May 2005 6:46:08 -0400
>Received: from mailscan3.cc.mcgill.ca (mailscan3.CC.McGill.CA [188.8.131.52]) by torrent.cc.mcgill.ca (8.12.11/8.12.3) with ESMTP id j45Ak65R024780 for <auditory@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 5 May 2005 06:46:08 -0400
>Received: from asmx5.McGill.CA (asmx5.mcgill.ca [184.108.40.206]) by mailscan3.cc.mcgill.ca (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j45Ak54v026682 for <auditory@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 5 May 2005 06:46:05 -0400 (EDT)
>Received: from asmx5.McGill.CA (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 3A4B4BA000C for <auditory@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 5 May 2005 06:45:53 -0400 (EDT)
>Received: from mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (mercure.iro.umontreal.ca [220.127.116.11]) by asmx5.McGill.CA (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC9E7BA0007 for <auditory@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 5 May 2005 06:45:52 -0400 (EDT)
>Received: from hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca [18.104.22.168]) by mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35769340017; Thu, 5 May 2005 06:46:05 -0400 (EDT)
>Received: from smtps.iro.umontreal.ca (merguez.iro.umontreal.ca [22.214.171.124]) by hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id C48204AC59F; Thu, 5 May 2005 05:42:37 -0400 (EDT)
>Received: from [192.168.0.101] (modemcable132.4-81-70.mc.videotron.ca [126.96.36.199]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtps.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68E0B1AF357; Thu, 5 May 2005 05:42:37 -0400 (EDT)
>X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2)
>X-DIRO-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
>X-DIRO-MailScanner: Found to be clean
>X-DIRO-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel (inscrit sur la liste blanche), SpamAssassin (score=-4.746, requis 5, autolearn=not spam, AWL 0.15, BAYES_00 -4.90)
>X-PMX-Version: 188.8.131.52324, Antispam-Engine: 184.108.40.206, Antispam-Data: 2005.5.5.5
>X-PerlMx-Spam: Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0'
>Comments: cc: krkluend@xxxxxxxx
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 May 2005 11:01:25.0200 (UTC) FILETIME=[C7947500:01C55161]
>>I am seeking advice on the best sound cards for PCs for both
>>The primary requirement is S/N on input and output. I know that
>>Turtle Beach was a favorite, but I don't know what's best today.
>>Thanks -- Keith
>One nice option is to skip internal sound cards and use a firewire
>USB interface. This means you can move the
>recording interface easily. For music creation this seems to have
>almost (though not quite!) entirely replaced PCI cards.
>You could look at the Motu 828 if you need lots of I/O. That's what
>we're using. Also some McGill folks us it.
>A smaller popular unit is the MAudio Firewire 410.
>Also for USB there are many options. The Edirol UA-25 is ok.
>Sweetwater's website is informative: www.sweetwater.com. Then
>"motu 828" and "firewire 410" etc...
>In any case, the quality of gear is very good right now. There's
>an explosion in home music recording thanks to good sequencing
>software. This has forced manufacturers to offer good low-end
>"prosumer" gear. (A soundcard with good S/N and hi quality mic
>is no longer
>something exotic.) Specs should be available online (S/N etc.)
>PS If you happen to be an Apple user, they seem to recommend the
>M-Audio boxes (or maybe it's just a marketing agreement):